Voterist

United States ballot research

Nonpartisan election research with receipts

Understand your ballot without guessing who to trust.

Look up your ballot and compare candidates with issue-by-issue scores grounded in their documented records. Every material claim links back to its source.

1. Find ballot
2. Scorecards ready

Find your ballot

Use your residential street address for exact district matching. It is sent to the Census Bureau or configured election-data provider and is not stored by Voterist.

ZIP alone is not precise enoughOfficial logistics link to election offices

Sample precinct ballot

3 races ready for review

Private

For candidates

Be accurately understood wherever voters ask.

Claim a Candidate Record, publish sourced positions, and audit what AI systems tell voters. Payment never changes Voterist’s comparisons or conclusions.

Candidate Record

Structured positions with claim-level receipts.

AI audit

Find inaccurate, missing, and stale answers.

Open candidate workspace

Pilot testing

Ready for first user sessions.

Use this panel during live tests. Notes stay in this browser until exported, so we can learn without adding accounts or storing private ballot choices.

5

Tasks

0

Done

0

Notes

Session checklist

Feedback note

Tester role

Trust rating

Citywide

Los Angeles Mayor

The mayor shapes the city budget, appoints department leaders, and negotiates priorities on housing, homelessness, public safety, and transportation.

Ready for review

Councilmember

Elena Marquez

3

issues scored

Housing-first city services with stronger delivery tracking.

Candidate record summary

Marquez has a documented record on housing affordability, transit reliability, and public safety accountability. Voterist scores only those sourced issue areas.

Housing

Strong recordHigh confidence

86

of 100

Supports streamlined permitting near transit and a citywide public land inventory for affordable housing.

Why this score: The score reflects specific supply and affordability actions, supported by both a published plan and a public forum record.

Transit reliability

Strong recordHigh confidence

88

of 100

Backs bus-only lanes on major corridors and safer walking routes around schools.

Why this score: Dedicated bus lanes directly address service speed and reliability; the proposal is repeated across two reviewed sources.

Public safety accountability

Strong recordMedium confidence

76

of 100

Supports alternative crisis response and quarterly LAPD stop-data publication.

Why this score: Alternative response and stop-data disclosure are concrete accountability measures, though the reviewed record is less extensive than on housing or transit.

Most reported support comes from labor, tenant advocacy, and small-dollar donors.

Business executive

Daniel Cho

3

issues scored

Permit reform, hiring incentives, and police staffing.

Candidate record summary

Cho has a documented record on housing affordability, transit reliability, and public safety capacity. His reviewed materials provide less operational detail on transit reliability.

Housing affordability

Mixed recordMedium confidence

62

of 100

Supports one-stop permitting and tax incentives for mixed-income development.

Why this score: Faster permitting could expand supply, but the reviewed plan is less specific about affordability requirements and long-term affordability.

Transit reliability

Weak recordMedium confidence

38

of 100

Mentions station safety and parking management, with limited detail on bus reliability.

Why this score: The reviewed record addresses station safety and parking, but offers little evidence of a plan to improve frequency or on-time service.

Public safety capacity

Mixed recordMedium confidence

68

of 100

Calls for hiring more officers and expanding retail theft enforcement.

Why this score: The proposals are concrete measures to expand enforcement capacity, supported by a published plan, but the record does not cover broader prevention or accountability outcomes.

Reported support is concentrated among business PACs and real estate donors.

Voter guide note

Compare the record issue by issue.

Scores describe documented support for a specific outcome. They are not averaged into an endorsement, and issues without a record are left unscored.

Civic guardrails

Designed for trust before scale.

The product can become powerful only if users, candidates, journalists, and election officials can understand how answers were produced.

Official logistics only

Deadlines, polling places, registration status, and ballot rules should come from official election offices, with Voterist linking out for action.

Every claim has a trail

Summaries are built from source packets, with labels for candidate-provided material, public records, forums, and newsroom reporting.

Score records, not voters

Issue scores use a published rubric and documented candidate actions. Voterist does not ask voters to rank priorities or turn scores into endorsements.

Paid profiles stay separate

Candidate payments can improve completeness and verification, not ranking, visibility, or recommendation weight.

Uncertainty is visible

Thin records, missing source types, and unresolved contradictions are surfaced instead of smoothed over by the AI layer.

Privacy by default

The MVP should avoid storing vote choices, keep address lookup separate from candidate research, and never expose voter-level data to campaigns.

Prototype content is fictional sample data. Real voting logistics should link to official election offices only.

Sample research mode